.Table of ContentsThe American Party System The Presidential Selection Process
The Nomination Campaign
Flow Chart of the Presidential Selection Process
Flow Chart of the 2000 Presidential ElectionParty Strength in Congress under Historical Party Systems
Electoral Coalitions of the Parties
Similarities and Differences between the Parties on Policy and Ideology
Differences between the Parties on Policy and Ideology
The Limited Range of Ideological Difference in the American Political SystemEras of Party Government and Divided Government
Party Control of Congress and the Presidency (1921-2000)
The Presidential Selection Process
The American presidential selection process is quite complicated and the exact rules change between each presidential campaign. Most Americans do not understand it completely, foreigners are often totally baffled. However, the presidential selection process can be broken into two basic phases—the struggle for major party nominations and the general election campaign. Each of these phases can be broken down into sub-periods.
The Nomination Campaign
Selecting Delegates to the National Convention
The key to the nomination campaign is winning delegates to the party’s national conventions, which are held in the summer of the election year. Delegates are selected state by state beginning in late January and ending in early June. Each state sets its own rules for choosing delegates and decides its own delegate selection dates, and these rules and dates often change between presidential election cycles. But there are two basic methods states use to select delegates—primaries and caucuses. Most states today use primaries, but some still use caucuses. In a primary, the voters of the state go to polling places and vote for candidates, much like in any election. However, in a primary there are actually two simultaneous elections—the Democratic and Republican primaries. Voters must declare which party’s contest they will vote in.
Candidates win delegates to the national convention based on the percentage of votes they get in the state. It is difficult to generalize about this process because each state’s rules are different. But for example, if George W. Bush wins 50% of the vote, John McCain wins 30% of the vote, and Steve Forbes wins 20% of the vote in the California Republican primary, Bush would get approximately 50% of California’s Republican delegates, McCain would get approximately 30% of California’s Republican delegates, and Forbes would get about 20% of California’s Republican delegates.
In caucus states the delegate selection method takes place in stages. Citizens gather in open Democratic and Republican party meetings and declare their preferences for candidates publicly. Temporary delegates to a state-wide or a regional caucus are selected, again based on the percentage of support each candidate has. At the regional and state-wide meetings this process is repeated until the state’s entire delegation to the national convention has been chosen.
In the United States, the nomination campaign stretches over more than 4 months. Traditionally the Iowa caucuses come first in late January and the New Hampshire primary comes a week later in early February. These early contests are crucial because historically only candidates who come in first or second in at least one of these two contests have been able to gather enough campaign contributions and volunteer workers to mount a successful national campaign. Actually, the presidential races begins years before the Iowa caucuses, as potential presidential candidates travel around the country, building support among party leaders, raising money for the upcoming campaign, and seeking national recognition in the opinion polls
Nomination Campaign General ElectionFlow Chart of the Presidential Selection Process
| Pre-Primary | Early Primaries and Caucuses | Other Primaries and Caucuses | Party Conventions | General Election Campaign | General Election Day | Electoral College | |
| Type of campaigning | Crossing the country
Raising money Getting Support from party leaders |
Face-to-face campaigning
TV ads |
TV coverage
TV ads |
TV coverage of convention |
News coverage
Crossing the country
TV ads |
||
|
Key to success |
Money
Opinion polls Getting Media Coverage Message |
Thematic Appeal
Support from party activists |
Image as
Winner Money Support from party activists |
Having a majority of delegates |
Mobilizing party supporters Winning independents |
Getting votes Winning largest population states |
Winning 270 electors |
| Number of candidates per party |
1-12 |
1-8 |
1-4 |
1-2 |
1 |
1 |
1 |
Flow Chart of the 2000 Presidential Selection Process
|
|
|
After |
After |
Other Primaries and Caucus |
|
Republicans |
Bush |
Bush |
Bush |
Bush |
Bush |
Democrats |
Gore |
Gore |
Gore |
Gore |
Gore |
Electoral Coalitions of the Parties
Both the Democrats and the Republicans have distinct pockets of political support. Each party’s vote comes from distinct sectors of society—different races, ethnic groups, religions, genders, geographical regions, income groups, etc. These tendencies are only statements of probability; they are not absolute. The probabilies also vary. For example in the 2000 presidential election more than 90% of blacks voted for the Democrat Al Gore, while the difference between women and men was more like 55%-45%.
DEMOCRATS REPUBLICANS
Black |
White |
Mexican/Puerto Rican |
Cuban |
Secular |
Evangelical Protestant |
Women |
Men |
East Coast |
Mountain states |
Urban |
Rural |
Poor |
Rich |
Less Educated + |
Middle Educated |
Union Member |
Non-union Member |
|
|
|
|
|
|
ISSUE DEMOCRATS REPUBLICANSSimilarities and Differences between the Parties on Policy and Ideology Both the Democratic and Republican Parties prefer to emphasize the policy differences between themselves. And there are very real differences between the American political parties. However there are also very remarkable similarities between the Democrats and Republicans. Both favor the agenda of the multinational corporations, both at home and abroad. Both support the corporate vision of globalization as the expansion of the American-style corporate system around the world. Both seek to maintain American political hegemony and Western cultural hegemony in the global system. Both share the 21st century version of America’s Manifest Destiny—that it is America’s duty to enlighten the less developed world to the virtues of American-style capitalism and democracy.Differences between the Parties on Policy and IdeologyThe differences and similarities of the Democrats and Republicans can be illustrated by the diagrams below. The first chart emphasizes the differences between the American parties. The second chart shows a range of political philosophies around the world, and where the differences between Democrats and Republicans fall on the global scale.
Social Spending |
Pro |
Anti |
Military Spending |
Anti |
Pro |
Budget Deficit |
Balanced Budget |
Tax Cuts |
Education |
Pro spending |
Anti spending |
Culture |
Pro multiculturalism |
Pro WASP monoculture |
Immigration |
Mixed |
Anti |
Life Style |
Liberal freedom |
Traditional values |
Abortion |
Pro Choice |
Pro Life |
Gay Rights |
Pro |
Anti |
Gun Control |
Pro |
Anti |
Environment |
Pro environment |
Pro big business |
Energy |
Alternative energy sources |
Pro big energy companies |
Unions |
Pro |
Anti |
Foreign Policy |
Favor diplomacy |
Favor military force |
International Alliances |
Multilateralist |
Unilateralist |
International Institutions |
Pro UN, IMF |
Anti UN, IMF, etc. |
China |
Engagement |
More Pro Taiwan |
Trade |
Mixed free trade and fair trade |
Pro free trade |
Global Ideological Scale
American Ideological Scale
Eras of Party Government and Divided GovernmentThe United States has three elective sections of national government, the president, the Senate and the House. When one political party wins control of the presidency and both Houses of Congress, it is called partygovernment. When at one particular time one party controls the presidency and the other party controls at least one House of Congress, this is called divided government. Party government has been the norm through most of American history, although there have also been periods of divided government. But since 1955, divided government has become the normal state of the American political system. The table below shows the rising frequency of divided government.
The next table breaks down the period from 1801-1954 into sub-eras.
Party Control of Congress and the Presidency
(1921-2000)
Year
President
Senate
House of
Representatives
*=Divided Government
| 1999* | D | R | R |
| 1997* | D | R | R |
| 1995* | D | R | R |
| 1993 | Clinton (D) | D | D |
| 1991* | R | D | D |
| 1989* | Bush (R) | D | D |
| 1987* | R | D | D |
| 1985* | R | R | D |
| 1983* | R | R | D |
| 1981* | Reagan ( R) | R | D |
| 1979 | D | D | D |
| 1977 | Carter (D) | D | D |
| 1975* | R (Ford) | D | D |
| 1973* | R | D | D |
| 1971* | R | D | D |
| 1969* | Nixon (R) | D | D |
| 1967 | D | D | D |
| 1965 | Johnson (D) | D | D |
| 1963 | D (Johnson) | D | D |
| 1961 | Kennedy (D) | D | D |
| 1959* | R | D | D |
| 1957* | R | D | D |
| 1955* | R | D | D |
| 1953 | Eisenhower ( R) | R | R |
| 1951 | (D) | D | D |
| 1949 | (D) | D | D |
| 1947* | (D) | R | R |
| 1945 | FDR/Truman (D) | D | D |
| 1943 | D | D | D |
| 1941 | D | D | D |
| 1939 | D | D | D |
| 1937 | D | D | D |
| 1935 | D | D | D |
| 1933 | F D Roosevelt (D) | D | D |
| 1931* | R | R | D |
| 1929 | Hoover (R) | R | R |
| 1927 | R | R | R |
| 1925 | Coolidge ( R) | R | R |
| 1923 | R (Coolidge) | R | R |
| 1921 | Harding (R) | R | R |
FOR A MORE ADVANCED TREATMENT OF THE AMERICAN
PARTY SYSTEM GO TO MY ARTICLE ON
THE HISTORIC SHIFT IN THE REGIONAL
BASES OF AMERICAN POLITICAL PARTIES